We often write posts explaining the implication of house repossession.
In reality many people are left with considerable financial and emotional problems when their house is repossessed.
However pets can end up being left abandoned or handed into the animal center as their owners are forced into rental accommodation.
The harsh reality is that many landlords will not allow their tenants to have pets.
However if you look hard enough, move further from the city or look for less desirable accommodation you should be able to find a suitable home. Then your whole family including your pet can stay together, which is important.
Do you think people who have their house repossessed have a moral responsibility to find new accommodation which allows them to keep their pet?